Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02326
Original file (BC 2013 02326.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:		DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-02326
		COUNSEL:  NONE
		HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

1.  She be allowed to transfer her Post-9/11 GI Bill Transfer of 
Educational Benefits (TEB) to her dependents.

2.  Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from 
Active Duty, item 15a Member Contributed to Post-Vietnam Era 
Veterans’ Educational Assistance Program, be amended to reflect 
“YES.”

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

She was not aware of the requirement to transfer education 
benefits while on active duty nor was she counseled on the TEB 
process prior to retirement.

In support of the applicant’s appeal, she provides a personal 
statement, DD Form 214, VA Form 4-5281, Application for Refund 
of Educational Contributions, and Air Force Print News on Post 
9/11 GI Bill.

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments is at 
Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________
_

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 30 September 2009, the applicant was relieved from active 
duty and retired on 1 October 2009, in the grade of major after 
serving 22 years, 8 months and 22 days on active duty.

Any member of the Armed Forces on or after 1 August 2009, who, 
at the time of the approval of the individual's request to 
transfer entitlement to educational assistance under this 
section, is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, has at least 
6 years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or 
Selected Reserve) on the date of election and agrees to serve a 
specified additional period in the Armed Forces from the date of 
election.

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, 
extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained 
in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air 
Force at Exhibit B.

________________________________________________________________
_

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIT recommends approval of the TEB.  DPSIT states the 
applicant was on terminal leave at program standup and did not 
receive proper counseling prior to entering terminal leave 
status.  The applicant did not have the opportunity to process 
the TEB action properly while on active duty.  Therefore, the 
applicant was the victim of an injustice and the TEB application 
should be approved, effective 30 September 2009.  With regard to 
the DD Form 214, item 15a (Member Contributed to Post-Vietnam 
Era Veterans’ Educational Assistance Program), DPSIT states IAW 
36-3202, Table 4, Rule 25, if the applicant withdraws her 
contribution from VEAP account or did not participate, mark NO.

The DPSIT complete evaluation is at Exhibit B.

________________________________________________________________
_

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 5 August 2013, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was 
forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 
30 days (Exhibit C).  As of this date, no response has been 
received by this office. 

________________________________________________________________
_

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice regarding the 
applicant’s request to change her DD Form 214, item 15a (to 
reflect “YES”.  We agree with the AFPC/DPSIT evaluation that 
item 15a was correctly annotated as “No” since the applicant did 
not participate in VEAP.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence 
to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting this 
portion of the applicant’s request.

4.  Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an injustice warranting approval 
with regard to her Post-9/11 GI Bill TEB.  In this respect, the 
Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) has indicated 
that through no fault of the applicant it appears she may not 
have been afforded the opportunity to transfer her Post-9/11 GI 
Bill TEB to her dependents because she was not informed of the 
requirement to complete a TEB for her dependents prior to her 
retirement.  As such, we believe the applicant was the victim of 
an injustice and recommend the records be corrected as indicated 
below.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air 
Force relating to the APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 
30 September 2009, she elected to transfer her Post-9/11 GI Bill 
Educational Benefits.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2013-02326 in Executive Session on 12 March 2014, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:


All members voted to correct the records as recommended.  The 
following documentary evidence was considered:

   Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 6 May 2013, w/atchs.
   Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 26 June 2013.
   Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR dated 5 August 2013.





2


3





Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00386

    Original file (BC-2013-00386.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Service members enrolled in the Post-9/11 GI Bill Program are able to transfer unused educational benefits to their dependent spouse or children. A complete copy of the DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit B. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05596

    Original file (BC 2013 05596.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. There is no record in MilConnect or the Right Now Technology showing the applicant made any inquiry/attempt to apply for the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) prior to retirement. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01349

    Original file (BC-2012-01349.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application arecontained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of theAir Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial noting the applicant has not provided any evidence showing she did not receive counseling onthe transfer of Post-9/11 education benefits. Any member of the ArmedForces, active duty or Selected Reserves, officer, or enlisted, on or after 1 August 2009, who is eligible for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02178

    Original file (BC 2013 02178.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02178 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be allowed to transfer her Post-9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) to her dependents. In support of the applicant’s appeal, she provides a copy of AF Form 1411, Extension or Cancellation of Extensions of Enlistment in the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05219

    Original file (BC 2013 05219.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Transferability of unused benefits to dependents: • Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) on or after 1 August 2009 who meets Post-9/11 GI Bill eligibility requirements and at the time of the approval of the member’s request to transfer entitlement to educational assistance the member meets one of the following: o Has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve, NOAA Corps, or PHS) on the date of application and agrees...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01605

    Original file (BC-2011-01605.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    38 USC Chapter 32 - Post-Vietnam ERA Veterans Educational Assistance Program (VEAP), Section 3201 was authorized to provide educational assistance to those men and women who entered the Armed Forces after 31 Dec 76, and before 1 Jul 85 and provided that they shall have the right to enroll in the educational benefits program provided by this Chapter at any time during such person's service on active duty before 1 Jul 85. In reaching our determination, we note the applicant’s stated request...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04835

    Original file (BC 2013 04835.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Post-9/11 GI Bill Transferability: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) who meets Post- 9/11 GI Bill eligibility requirements and at the time of the approval of the member’s request to transfer entitlement to educational assistance: Has at least six years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) on the date of election and agrees to serve four additional years in the Air Force from the date of request, regardless of the number of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04584

    Original file (BC 2013 04584.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04584 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her records be corrected to show she transferred her Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits (TEB) to her dependents while on active duty. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is included at...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02170

    Original file (BC 2014 02170.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board should find it in the interest of justice to consider her untimely application because in 2008 she investigated her dependent’s ability to claim the education benefit and was told that since she did not transfer while on active duty it could not now be done. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00880

    Original file (BC-2010-00880.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, the Board could find that there was an injustice if the members were on active duty on 1 Aug 09, were not personally counseled about the need to execute a transfer while serving in the Armed Forces, and did not have ready access to DoD and Air Force guidance because of their terminal leave status. The transfer date could be effective as early as 1 Aug 09 and there would be no need to place the member on active duty since the TEB system allows for correction of the record by Air...